Custody Agreement When Child Turns 18

This case is unique in that there is no longer custody after the age of 18 of a child. This is the first known judgment in the 6th arrondissement to do so, but other districts have made custody decisions for 18-year-olds. For example, a judge wants to make sure that a child has not been bribed or threatened to choose one parent over the other. In addition, a judge wants to know why the child chooses a parent (i.e. because there are no rules?). The judge does not have to follow the wishes of the child. Apparently, 12-year-olds and young teens want to do all sorts of things that parents don`t allow them to do. A 13-year-old might really want to go to a particular concert, but parents might decide that the lyrics are too bad or that the time is too late and say “no.” For the same reason, a judge might listen to a child`s custody wishes while saying “no” because it is not in the best interests of the child to live with that parent in the first place. The 4th arrondissement issued a similar judgment in another published opinion, In re Marriage of Gamble. The case also concerned a father who had been on appeal when the child was 18 years old, much like in the case of the 6th arrondissement. Does the judge have to follow the child`s wishes? Can my child determine the details of the visit, for example.B. what days and times the visit will take place? California can appoint a mediator to help parents reach agreements on child welfare and childcare issues. The Ombudsman can help parents develop an educational plan that a judge can approve and turn into a custody or support order.

Mediators have comprehensive training to develop a plan in the best interests of the child, although it is recommended that parents have the plan verified by a lawyer before signing. In William v. In the Cavers case, the mother applied for custody in court when the child turned 17. The father, who was a custodial parent, opposed the amendment, the parents could not agree with the help of a mediator. The Ombudsman recommended that the mother be granted custody at the end of the school year, which the father again refused. In a subsequent trial, the Court of Justice followed the Ombudsman`s recommendations. The father continued to appeal, and during his appeal trial, the daughter turned 18. In a jury trial, the judge cannot question the child in chambers on which parent should decide where the child lives primarily. In a non-jury trial, it is up to the judge to decide whether or not to allow lawyers to be present at the interrogation. If one of the parties so requests, the judge must have a judicial journalist in the judge`s office to record the interview with the child. Parents are not allowed to enter the judge`s office during the interview. Not knowing when child assistance will end can be a concern, especially if you are the parent receiving child assistance.

In most countries, child assistance ends when the child reaches the age of 18, goes to university, dies or marries. However, some states allow continued support for children beyond the age of 18 in certain circumstances, for example.B. if the child still lives at home and attends high school or if the child has special needs. . . .

Beğen